Table of contents
- 2. REPORTING AT SURFACE WATER BODY LEVEL (SCHEMA SWB)
- 2.3. Pressures and impacts on surface waters
- 2.4. Ecological status and exemptions
- 2.5. Chemical status of surface waters, exemptions and Mixing Zones
- 3. REPORTING AT GROUNDWATER BODY LEVEL (SCHEMA GWB)
- 3.3. Pressures and impacts on groundwater
- 3.4. Quantitative status of groundwater and exemptions
- 3.5. Chemical status of groundwater and exemptions
- 4. MONITORING (SCHEMA MONITORING)
- 5. PROTECTED AREAS (SCHEMAS SWB AND GWB)
- 6. REPORTING AT MS LEVEL: COMPETENT AUTHORITIES, RBDS AND SUB-UNITS (SCHEMA RBDSUCA)
- 7. REPORTING AT RBD/SUB-UNIT LEVEL FOR SURFACE WATER (SCHEMA SWMET)
- 7.3. Methodologies classification ecological status and potential
- 7.4. Methodologies classification chemical status
- 7.5. Overall management objectives (nutrients, river continuity)
- 7.6. Definition of significant pressures and impacts
- 7.7. Methodologies exemptions
- 8. REPORTING AT RBD/SUB-UNIT LEVEL FOR GROUNDWATER (SCHEMA GWMET)
- 8.4. Definition of significant pressures and impacts
- 8.5. Methodologies exemptions
- 9. REPORTING AT RBD/SUB-UNIT LEVEL FOR RBMP (SCHEMA RBMPPOM)
- 9.4. Water abstractions and exploitation of water resources
- 10. PROGRAMME OF MEASURES REPORTED AT RBD/SUB-UNIT LEVEL (SCHEMA RBMPPOM)
- 10.2. Targeted questions on basic measures and other aspects
- 10.3. Estimates of cost of measures
- 10.4. Co-ordination of measures in international RBDs
- 10.5. Progress with and achievements of the programme of measures for the first planning cycle
- 11. REPORTING AT RBD/SUB-UNIT LEVEL FOR ECONOMIC ANALYSIS AND COST RECOVERY (SCHEMA RBMPPOM)
- Overview of comments presented at WG DIS
- WISE spatial data presentation at WG DIS
7. REPORTING AT RBD/SUB-UNIT LEVEL FOR SURFACE WATER (SCHEMA SWMET)
Article 5 of the WFD requires Member States to identify surface water bodies that will be used for assessing progress with, and achievement of, the WFD’s Environmental Objectives. In addition, under certain conditions, Article 4(3) of the WFD permits Member States to identify and designate artificial water bodies (AWB) and heavily modified water bodies (HMWB). AWB and HMWB are required to achieve Good Ecological Potential (GEP) by 2015.
Identifying the size of surface water bodies was an important parameter that had implications on the design of the monitoring programmes and on the development of appropriate programmes of measures. A stepwise process for the identification of AWB and HMWB resulted in a provisional identification by 2004. Full identification should have been completed by 2010 for publication in the first RBMPs. The characterisation of surface water body types, including the identification of AWB and HMWB, may have been reviewed and revised as part of the review and update (if necessary) of the Article 5 analysis, required by December 2013.
Article 5 also requires Member States to analyse the characteristics of surface water bodies and to provide a summary report on surface water characterisation, including general information on their typology.
Class SWType
- Please include here any comments which apply to all the schema elements in this Class.
- In addition to those general schema element level comments, we welcome your views on: a) whether you think this Class can be simplified; and b) whether you think the linkages with other reporting Classes or Schemas can be improved, and how;
swTypeCode -Required.
Member State code for the characterisation type of the water body, as reported for each water body in the surface water schema (SWB), and the RBMP and background documents. If typology for HMWBs and/or AWBs has been derived and used it should be reported here. This will allow reporting of e.g. physico-chemical standards linked to these types under the schema SWMET.
swTypeDescription - Required.
Briefly describe the type (e.g. small, lowland, siliceous rivers). Provide a reference to where further details can be found in the RBMP and background documents.
swIntercalibrationType - Required.(SWIntercalibrationType_Enum)
If the surface water body type corresponds with an intercalibration type, report the intercalibration type code (not name).
swTypeCategory - Required.(SWCategory_Enum)
Report the category of surface water body to which this type refers.
swTypeSpecificReferenceConditionsForBQEs - Required.(AllSomeNone_Enum)
Indicate whether type-specific reference conditions have been established for this surface water type for all relevant BQEs
swTypeSpecificReferenceConditionsForHyMoQEs - Required.(AllSomeNone_Enum)
Indicate whether type-specific reference conditions have been established for this surface water type for all relevant hydromorphological QEs.
-
-
The terminology is wrong. They are not called 'type-specific reference conditions' for HyMoBQE.
Those are 'type-specific HyMo conditions'.
They are not "reference" values, as the boundaries for the classification of ecological status are not established as a deviation from those type-specific values. (They are thresholds and values).
This is not a minor problem.
Refer to the text of the WFD Annex II.1.3.i and Guidance document Nº10 on reference conditions or Nº 13 on the assesment of ecological status for further explanation.
RO supports the ES comment in relation to terminology.
-
-
By asking type-specific reference conditions Commission have made misinterpretation that Finland doesn’t have any reference condition for HyMoQEs (text below). Our reference conditions for HyMoQEs are based on water categories, not types.
European Overview - River Basin Management Plans, SWD(2019) 30 final p.6 :
“Progress has been made since the first RBMPs in the establishment of reference conditions, however gaps still remain, as in most Member States, reference conditions have not been established for all water body types (rivers, lakes, transitional and costal) and for all quality elements and for all quality elements. A few Member States have established all reference conditions, including Austria, Hungary and Poland. The quality elements whose type-specific reference conditions showed the most significant gaps for surface water body types were found to be the hydro-morphological ones, as most Member States established reference conditions only for some water categories, and 8 Member States did not establish reference conditions for any water category (including Denmark, Finland, France, Croatia, Italy, Latvia and Malta).”
swTypeSpecificReferenceConditionsForPhysChemQEs - Required.(AllSomeNone_Enum)
Indicate whether type-specific reference conditions have been established for this surface water type for all relevant physico-chemical QEs
-
The terminology is wrong. They are not called 'type-specific reference conditions' for PhysChemBQE.
Those are 'type-specific PhysChem conditions'.
They are not "reference" values, as the boundaries for the classification of ecological status are not established as a deviation from those type-specific values. (They are thresholds and values).
This is not a minor problem.
Refer to the text of the WFD Annex II.1.3.i and Guidance document Nº10 on reference conditions or Nº 13 on the assesment of ecological status for further explanation.
-
The terminology is wrong. They are not called 'type-specific reference conditions' for PhysChemBQE.
Those are 'type-specific PhysChem conditions'.
They are not "reference" values, as the boundaries for the classification of ecological status are not established as a deviation from those type-specific values. (They are thresholds and values).
This is not a minor problem.
Refer to the text of the WFD Annex II.1.3.i and Guidance document Nº10 on reference conditions or Nº 13 on the assesment of ecological status for further explanation.
RO supports the ES comment in relation to terminology.
-
Class SWMethodologies
- Please include here any comments which apply to all the schema elements in this Class.
- In addition to those general schema element level comments, we welcome your views on: a) whether you think this Class can be simplified; and b) whether you think the linkages with other reporting Classes or Schemas can be improved, and how;
typologyMethodologyReference - Required.(ReferenceType)
Provide references or hyperlinks to the documents and sections where relevant information relating to the typology methodology can be found. Guidance on what should be included in this document is provided in Section 7.2.3.3.
smallWBsMethodologyReference - Required.(ReferenceType)
Provide references or hyperlinks to the documents and sections where relevant information relating to the methodology for small water bodies can be found. Guidance on what should be included in this document is provided in Section 7.2.3.3.
-
We suggest to delete this schema element. The WFD doesn't foresee a definition for small WBs and it is not clear for us why information regarding small WBs should be listed separately here.
minimumCatchmentAreaRivers - Required.
If defined, state the minimum catchment area in km² for a river to be delineated as a water body in the RBMP. If not defined report -8888.
minimumSurfaceAreaLakes - Required.
If defined, state the minimum surface area in km² for a lake to be delineated as a water body in the RBMP. If not defined report -8888
otherMinimumCriteria - Optional.
If the minimum criteria used for the delineation of river water bodies is not based on catchment area, or for lake water bodies is not based on surface area, describe the criteria used.
-
Change the explanatory text:
If the minimum criteria used for the delineation of river water bodies is not based on catchment area, or for lake water bodies is not based on surface area, describe the criteria used.
With:
If the minimum criteria used for the delineation of river water bodies is not based on catchment area (or not only based on it), or for lake water bodies is not based on surface area (or not only based on it), describe the criteria used.
This is the case in Spain where it is based on area but not only on it.
iRBDTypologyCoOrdinationReference - Conditional.(ReferenceType)
Provide references or hyperlinks to the documents and sections where relevant information relating to the co-ordination of typology methodology in international RBDs can be found. Guidance on what should be included in this document is provided in Section 7.2.3.3.
hmwbMethodologyReference - Required.(ReferenceType)
Provide references or hyperlinks to the documents and sections where any relevant information relating to the methodology for the designation of AWB and HMWB, can be found. Guidance on what should be included in this document is provided in Section 7.2.3.3.
Guidance on contents of RBMPs/Background Documents
(Please see the full text of this sub-section in the WFD Reporting Guidance 2016 or above chapter)
Include here any comments that relate to the information contained in this sub-section of the Reporting Guidance, namely concerning information you think could/should be reported electronically and information which you believe should not be included in the River Basin Management Plans or background documents.
The terminology is wrong. They are not called 'type-specific reference conditions' for HyMoBQE.
Those are 'type-specific HyMo conditions'.
They are not "reference" values, as the boundaries for the classification of ecological status are not established as a deviation from those type-specific values. (They are thresholds and values).
This is not a minor problem.
Refer to the text of the WFD Annex II.1.3.i and Guidance document Nº10 on reference conditions or Nº 13 on the assesment of ecological status for further explanation.