Post a comment on the text below

Slide 11

SurfaceWaterBodyCentreline

  • Currently it is optional
  • Could it be reported
    for lakes and reservoirs?

Previous comments

  • SE - Sweden (invited by kristpet (disabled)) 02 May 2019 11:23:23
    Currently it is optional SE: The information is already requested and not optional
    Could it be reported for lakes and reservoirs? SE: Yes. We are of the opinion that is can and should be reported
  • NO - Norway (invited by kristpet (disabled)) 03 May 2019 10:14:20
    • Centreline was not optional
    • Yes, Norway wish to report this
  • FI - Finland1 (invited by kristpet (disabled)) 03 May 2019 10:21:08

    Centerline should be kept optional.

    In Finland there are some lakes without the connection for river network and those they cannot get centerline.

  • IT - Italy (invited by kristpet (disabled)) 03 May 2019 16:04:14
    • the SurfaceWaterbodyCentreline is not optional
    • Yes, it is imprtant to keep it
  • PT - Portugal (invited by kristpet (disabled)) 03 May 2019 18:10:59
    • Currently it is optional

    In WISE GIS Guidance (Version 6.0.6) the representation of the centrelines of surface water bodies is requested.

    • Could it be reported for lakes and reservoirs?

     We are of the opinion that is can and should be reported.

  • SI - Slovenia (invited by kristpet (disabled)) 03 May 2019 21:54:55

    Regarding SurfaceWaterBodyCentreline it is our opinion that the reporting should remain "optional".

You cannot post comments to this consultation because you are not authenticated. Please log in.