Post a comment on the text below

Previous comments

• SE - Sweden (invited by kristpet (disabled)) 02 May 2019 11:10:53

  Inventory of emissions discharged into surface waters, suggestion is to establish the possibility to report e.g. total PAH and also single substances for emissions from major polluters.	SE: No We do not agree as we are of the opinion that any changes in the lists should not be possible inbetween cycles
  Inventory methodology should be reported only for those substances/pollutants that pass the relevance criteria, if "relevance RBD Scale" is "Yes". For others it should be optional. Conditional check: report if relevanceRBDScale is "Yes".	SE: No. We do not agree
  weiNational – should be reported at national level. RBMPPoM module refers to RBD level information	SE: No. We do not agree

• SI - Slovenia (invited by kristpet (disabled)) 03 May 2019 21:46:07

  1.Regarding Comment no. 235 in "Talkback_comments_28.03.19.xls„, we do not agree with the proposal regarding the reporting of emissions at the level of polluters because the level of detail to report would be more detailed than requested by the WFD.  Directive 2008/105/EC clearly points out that each Member State should establish an inventory of emissions, discharges and losses for each river basin district or part of a river basin district in its territory.

  2.Regarding Comment no. 237 in "Talkback_comments_28.03.19.xls„, we agree with the proposed aspect, that reporting of substances that do not pass the relevance criteria, should be optional.

  3.Regarding Comment no. 244 in "Talkback_comments_28.03.19.xls„, we agree with the proposal to report only at national level.