Post a comment on the text below

  • Link to the EEA vocabulary list protected area
  • Logic of SW ecological status for example i.e.   swEcologicalStatusOrPotentialExpectedGoodIn2015 and swChemicalStatusExpectedGoodIn2015 
  • should be followed when talking about protectedXXXObjectivesMet
  • Shellfish Directive vs Regulation on products of animal origin intended for human consumption (The monitoring and control of microbial contamination seems stricter according to the regulation than the old Shellfish directive.)

Previous comments

  • SE - Sweden (invited by kristpet (disabled)) 02 May 2019 11:08:06
    Link to the EEA vocabulary list protected area  
    Logic of SW ecological status for example i.e.   swEcologicalStatusOrPotentialExpectedGoodIn2015 and swChemicalStatusExpectedGoodIn2015  SE:  No. We do not agree
    Should be followed when talking about protectedXXXObjectivesMet  
    Shellfish Directive vs Regulation on products of animal origin intended for human consumption (The monitoring and control of microbial contamination seems stricter according to the regulation than the old Shellfish directive.) SE: Yes. We agree with the original wording of the suggestion, see talkback comments
  • SI - Slovenia (invited by kristpet (disabled)) 03 May 2019 09:59:52

    1.Regarding Comment no. 187  in "Talkback_comments_28.03.19.xls„, we agree with the aspect set out in the comment.

    2.Regarding Comment no. 188 in "Talkback_comments_28.03.19.xls„, we cannot agree or disagree on the comment because it is not clear what is proposed.

You cannot post comments to this consultation because you are not authenticated. Please log in.