Post a comment on the text below

reportedUnderSoEEmissions - Conditional.(YesNoCode_Enum)

Has the two-step approach in CIS-Guidance No 28 been followed? Step 1 requires an assessment of the current relevance of the substance at the RBD level. Step 2 requires a more detailed analysis for the substances which pass the relevance criteria given in Step 1 (i.e. they are relevant at the RBD level). For those substances that are of minor relevance at the RBD scale (i.e. do not meet Step 1 criteria), MS should try to provide a basic estimation of emissions, discharges and losses from point and diffuse sources: this is particularly important for Priority Hazardous Substances. Together with Schema element relevanceRBDScale this element determines the data-set to be reported for each substance.

Previous comments

  • LU - Luxembourg1 (invited by kristpet (disabled)) 26 Apr 2019 15:11:39

    It is not clear for us why does this information has to be reported therefore we would suggest to delete this schema element.

You cannot post comments to this consultation because you are not authenticated. Please log in.