Post a comment on the text below

Class ChemicalMonitoring(child of MonitoringSite)

Please include here any comments which apply to all the schema elements in this Class.
In addition to those general schema element level comments, we welcome your views on: a) whether you think this Class can be simplified; and b) whether you think the linkages with other reporting Classes or Schemas can be improved, and how;

Previous comments

IT - Italy (invited by kristpet (disabled)) 26 Mar 2019 08:55:48

For some RBD, the number of records is very high therefore the table is unmanageable. Maybe it should be separated at least for surface and groundwater.
- HU1 - Hungary (invited by kristpet (disabled)) 03 May 2019 14:02:12
  
  For some RBD, the number of records is very high therefore the table is unmanageable. Maybe it should be separated at least for surface and groundwater.
  
  HU: For all the large data tables GW and SW should be separated into two data tables. Probably in the majority of MSs these are stored in separate databases.
LU - Luxembourg1 (invited by kristpet (disabled)) 25 Apr 2019 11:25:43

In order to facilitate the reporting we would also suggest to have separate classes for GWBs and SWBs.

You cannot post comments to this consultation because you are not authenticated. Please log in.