Back to section

Post a comment on the text below

Class: Programme (monitoring)

  1. Please include here any comments which apply to all the schema elements in this Class.
  2. In addition to those general schema element level comments, we welcome your views on: a) whether you think this Class can be simplified;  and b) whether you think the linkages with other reporting Classes or Schemas can be improved, and how;

Previous comments

  • SE - Sweden (invited by kristpet (disabled)) 22 Mar 2019 13:24:34

    This schema was much altered and improved since reporting schema version 2010.

  • HU - Hungary (invited by kristpet (disabled)) 25 Mar 2019 13:01:54

    It is not clear that if a slight or any other change was made in an element of a monitoring programme, may the same code be reported by modified content or a new code should be generated.
    Monitoring programme categories are in GML schema without any link to XML.
    Missing the KTM to report if it is planned to change any of the monitoring programmes in the future.

    • HU1 - Hungary (invited by kristpet (disabled)) 03 May 2019 13:58:28

       

      It is not clear that if a slight or any other change was made in an element of a monitoring programme, may the same code be reported by modified content or a new code should be generated.
      Monitoring programme categories are in GML schema without any link to XML.

      HU: Attributes in GML schema should be streamed to XML (e.g. WB’s name, monitoring sites purposes) to ensure consistency and avoid double work. Thus HU supports IT, ES and BE-Fl comments under Class MonitoringPurpose(child of MonitoringSite).


      Missing the KTM to report if it is planned to change any of the monitoring programmes in the future.

       HU: Please, add a KTM code for improvement/modification of monitoring programme because it is inconceivable that monitoring programme is completely the same in the next cycle. This issue is in connection with comments on whether past or future programmes should be reported.

  • LU - Luxembourg1 (invited by kristpet (disabled)) 25 Apr 2019 11:43:19

    It wasn't entirely clear for us which monitoring programmes should be reported here (e.g. only monitoring programmes used for status assessment) and this needs to be clarified.

You cannot post comments to this consultation because you are not authenticated. Please log in.