Post a comment on the text below

gwQuantitativeStatusExpectedAchievementDate - Conditional. (GoodStatus_Enum)

If good quantitative status will not be achieved by 2015 (gwQuantitativeStatusExpectedGoodIn2015 is No), report the date by which it is expected that it will be achieved in full.

Previous comments

  • ES - Spain (invited by kristpet (disabled)) 19 Mar 2019 13:32:44

    This field does not solve the problem when a WB has both 4(4) (time extension) and 4(5) (less stringent objective) exemptions.

    The current codelist do not allow identifying cases when a GWB has 'less stringent objective already achieved' but it is not in compliance with all environmental objectives because of other quality element (without less stringent objective) but with a time extension (ie 2022-2027). 

    We suggest to split the field in two. Leaving this field as it is now but removing from the codelist 'less stringent objective already achieved'.

    A new field should be included in order to report the achievement of less stringent objectives for quality elements with a 4(5) exemption.

  • ES - Spain (invited by kristpet (disabled)) 19 Mar 2019 16:34:10

    We have introduce incoherent combinations in the access database without getting blockers

    Although in the XML generation this field is ignored, the Access file that is the source of information in Spain remains unchanged and produces many problems when using it for statistical analysis.

    Would it be possible to include checks in this sense in the Access database?

    Next check should be implemented:

    If gwQuantitativestatusExpectedGoodIn2015 is ‘Yes’ this element must not be reported.

    GENERAL COMMENT

    The Quality checks should include not only a conditional check requiring a value when the condition is fulfilled, but also requiring the field to be left empty "NULL" when the condition is not fulfilled.

    It can be implemented in the Access database by adding in all codelist a 'Not applicable' value required when the condition is not fulfilled.

  • FR1 - France (invited by kristpet (disabled)) 29 Apr 2019 16:29:38

    Is it possible to set up new targets 2028-2033?

    see previous comment about Mayotte.

  • PL - Poland1 (invited by kristpet (disabled)) 03 May 2019 15:55:55

    In the schema element: gwQuantitativeStatusExpectedAchievementDate it is not clear which answer should be chosen when a less stringent objective is expected to be achieved in the future

You cannot post comments to this consultation because you are not authenticated. Please log in.