Back to section

Post a comment on the text below

gwSignificantPressureType - Required.(SignificantPressureType_Enum)

Indicate the significant pressure type(s) from the enumeration list .

Previous comments

  • ES - Spain (invited by kristpet (disabled)) 21 Mar 2019 12:09:50

    Similar comment to SWsignificantPressureType

    The codelist of Annex 1a shouldn't be splitted by drivers as usually the relation pressure- driver is 1:n

  • ES - Spain (invited by kristpet (disabled)) 21 Mar 2019 13:42:58

    Since the guidance says 'Significant pressures should only be reported for those water bodies which have been identified as being at risk'

    we propose to extend the quality check (not only check consistency with status but with risk aswell)

    Within-schema check: If (SWB/GroundWaterBody/gwChemicalStatusValue is ‘3’  or GWB/GroundWaterBody/gwChemicalStatusExpectedGoodIn2015=No), at least one significant pressure type must be selected from the enumeration list (can include ‘8 Unknown pressures’). The option ‘No significant pressure’ is not a valid selection.

    and the same check for quantitative status/risk

  • SE - Sweden (invited by kristpet (disabled)) 22 Mar 2019 10:29:14

    List of pressure types and impact types should be announced in an early stage of the management cycle. Befor the analysis has been done. No midcycle change.

  • LU - Luxembourg1 (invited by kristpet (disabled)) 25 Apr 2019 10:16:10

    See comment submitted for "swSignificantPressureType".

  • NO - Norway (invited by kristpet (disabled)) 03 May 2019 14:51:55

    The pick up list could be filtered on types for GW og SW in the Access tool

  • BE (invited by kristpet (disabled)) 03 May 2019 17:24:38

    List of pressure types and impact types should be announced in an early stage of the management cycle. Befor the analysis has been done.

You cannot post comments to this consultation because you are not authenticated. Please log in.