Post a comment on the text below

qeGrouping - Conditional.

If no monitoring data is available for this surface water body and status has been derived through grouping by extrapolating monitoring data from other surface water bodies, indicate the codes of the surface water bodies which have been monitored and used in grouping.

For example, if the status of surface water body A has been determined by extrapolating monitoring data from surface water bodies B and C, then the euSurfaceWaterBodyCode for surface water bodies B and C should be reported in this element.

Previous comments

ES - Spain (invited by kristpet (disabled)) 20 Mar 2019 13:08:22

Please, in order to avoid misundarstanding, add to the explanatory text, the text underlined:

If no monitoring data is available for this quality element in this surface water body and status has been derived through grouping by extrapolating monitoring data from other surface water bodies, indicate the codes of the surface water bodies which have been monitored and used in grouping.
- RO - Romania1 (invited by kristpet (disabled)) 25 Apr 2019 09:24:27
  
  Please, in order to avoid misundarstanding, add to the explanatory text, the text underlined:
  
  If no monitoring data is available for this quality element in this surface water body and status has been derived through grouping by extrapolating monitoring data from other surface water bodies, indicate the codes of the surface water bodies which have been monitored and used in grouping.
  
  RO supports ES suggestion, it is useful to mention also "quality element" in the explanatory text.
SE - Sweden (invited by kristpet (disabled)) 22 Mar 2019 11:00:03

In this way it is reported that the classification is based on grouping and it is possible to se if the grouped water is of same category, type and pressure situation. And is situated in the same RBD. The groups ar only indirectly reported. Could be enough.
- BE (invited by kristpet (disabled)) 03 May 2019 17:11:09
  
  In this way it is reported that the classification is based on grouping and it is possible to se if the grouped water is of same category, type and pressure situation. And is situated in the same RBD. The groups ar only indirectly reported. Could be enough.
  
  In some cases, it is possible to group SWB for fysical-chemical QE, but not biological QE or hydromophological QE. So BE want to maintain the grouping by QE.
IT - Italy (invited by kristpet (disabled)) 27 Mar 2019 12:31:29

To be in line with comment on class QualityElement, this schema element should be for surfacewaterbody and not for each QE of surfacewaterbody.
EL - Greece (invited by kristpet (disabled)) 02 May 2019 11:06:56

Due to the large number of RBDs and because the grouping is performed at national level, in Greece there are several cases where the (monitored) surface water bodies which are used in grouping are part of a different RBD (different database). Could there be an option to indicate the codes of surface water bodies (used in grouping) of different RBDs, in order to avoid to include this information in Annex 0?

You cannot post comments to this consultation because you are not authenticated. Please log in.