Class: SWEcologicalExemptionType (child of SurfaceWaterBody)
Previous comments
3
BG - Bulgaria (invited by kristpet (disabled))
21 Mar 2019 16:26:34
We suggest to simplify the reporting of some datasets, by excluding of the implicit information - not to report the SWBs without exemptions (“No exemptions” option ); to report only the SWBs for which exemptions are applied ( For Danube RBD in BG, 58% of the records in this table were reported as “No exemptions”)
EL - Greece (invited by kristpet (disabled))
02 May 2019 13:00:09
We suggest to simplify the reporting of some datasets, by excluding of the implicit information - not to report the SWBs without exemptions (“No exemptions” option ); to report only the SWBs for which exemptions are applied ( For Danube RBD in BG, 58% of the records in this table were reported as “No exemptions”)
EL supports the BG suggestion
NO - Norway (invited by kristpet (disabled))
03 May 2019 14:24:37
"No exemption" is also data and needed in the XML
You cannot post comments to this consultation because you are not authenticated. Please log in.
Previous comments
We suggest to simplify the reporting of some datasets, by excluding of the implicit information - not to report the SWBs without exemptions (“No exemptions” option ); to report only the SWBs for which exemptions are applied ( For Danube RBD in BG, 58% of the records in this table were reported as “No exemptions”)
EL supports the BG suggestion
"No exemption" is also data and needed in the XML