Post a comment on the text below

swFailingRBSP - Required (RBSP_Enum).

If the status or potential of QE 3-3 River Basin Specific Pollutants is less than good (as reported in class QualityElement, see below), select the code and name of the RBSP.

The RBSPs selected from the enumeration list must be included in the methodology schema (SWMET/SWRBSP/rbsp) where details of all RBSPs’ good-moderate EQS are reported, i.e. the RBSPs reported in this element are those that are failing their associated good-moderate EQS in this surface water body.

Previous comments

SE - Sweden (invited by kristpet (disabled)) 22 Mar 2019 10:57:51

Changes in the list of specific pollutants between cycles should be avioded or communicated early in the cycle. For instance the way some substances are grouped. If this changes in mid cycle when classifications are performed there will be much work in trying to report.
BE-Fl Belgium Flanders (invited by kristpet (disabled)) 27 Mar 2019 09:52:24

There is no distinction between the good status of an RBSP and the unknown status of an RBSP in a SWB. At this moment, the conclusion in the assessment reports is : when there is no reported failing for a RBSP in a SWB, the status for this RBSP is good in this SWB.
- BE (invited by kristpet (disabled)) 03 May 2019 16:07:27
  
  There is no distinction between the good status of an RBSP and the unknown status of an RBSP in a SWB. At this moment, the conclusion in the assessment reports is : when there is no reported failing for a RBSP in a SWB, the status for this RBSP is good in this SWB.
  
  Please ad also the substances that are in a good status

You cannot post comments to this consultation because you are not authenticated. Please log in.