Post a comment on the text below

keyTypeMeasureIndicatorValue2021 - Required.

For each pre-defined quantitative indicator relating to the KTMs selected in keyTypeMeasureIndicator, report the expected value of that indicator at the start of the third cycle in 2021.

Previous comments

DK - Denmark (invited by kristpet (disabled)) 20 Mar 2019 15:33:41

For some of the pressures, where the IndicatorGAP value for 2021 is more than "0", Denmark has not decided which measures should be used after 2021 to reach the goal for the IndicatorGap. This is because we want to await the result of the implemented measures and possibly new knowledge.

Because of the fact that precise measures have not yet been decided for the pressures, Denmark can only report the 2015 and 2018 values of the KTMindicator as an expression for the goal to reach in the second period of the RBMP and not as an expression to reach good ecological status or good chemical status.

Denmark had asked Helpdesk how to handle this, and the answer was to estimate the needed area to cover by the measures in order to reach good status.

The problem to this solution is that the estimated area depends on the decided measures. For example is the area needed very different whether we use Catch Crops, wetland or maybe something far more efficient. Also the stakeholders will wonder, if they can see that we in Denmark is reporting specific measures for the 3rd RBMP before they are political decided.

The problem above arises as a result of reporting of the 2nd RBMP and will not be a problem in a last period of the WFD.
LU - Luxembourg1 (invited by kristpet (disabled)) 29 Apr 2019 09:09:25

See our comment regarding the class "keyTypeMeasureIndicator".

You cannot post comments to this consultation because you are not authenticated. Please log in.