Post a comment on the text below

Table 2.10 Reported examples of success factors for stakeholder involvement

Success factor		Countries
Basis for involvement
Awareness raising	“raising importance of climate change and adaptation in the eyes of all stakeholders“	BG, DK, LI, LV, PT
Providing knowledge	“communication of scientific results” “dissemination of information” “being transparent and honest about climate change uncertainties to gain credibility” “bring in scientific results/studies”	AT, DE, IT, LI, MT
Capacity building	“capacity building” “build capacity at the beginning to enable a good comprehension of stakes”	FR, PT
Characteristics of involvement process
Involvement early in the process	“early involvement into the policy process” “active involvement from very beginning of process” “involvement at an early stage of policy development” “promoting engagement at an early and appropriate stage”	AT, DK, FR, IT, LV
Two way communication	“good communication” “multi-directional knowledge/information transfer” “constructive dialogue” “provide fora for interactive discussions between policy makers / stakeholders and scientists”	AT, BE, CZ, DK, RO
Methods of involvement	“system approach” “choose the right format” “different designs should be used [for different stakeholders]”	CZ, DE, FI
Transparency of process	“transparent and effective protocols” “transparency in order to follow process” “clear and transparent process” “transparency” “be open and build trust”	AT, ES, FI, RO, SI
Continuity of processes	“follow-up process” “feedback”	DK, ES
Range and role of involved stakeholders
Selection of stakeholders	“engage right stakeholders” “identifying the right stakeholders to be involved” “engage key audiences” “choice of stakeholders – focused approach”	CH, FI, MT, UK
Involving a wide range of stakeholders	“active engagement from all stakeholders” “identifying all relevant stakeholders and motivating them to participate” “different types of stakeholders should be involved” “involvement of various stakeholders” “involvement of all the stakeholder groups”	CZ, DE, IT, LV, SI, SK
Definition of roles and responsibilities	“defining responsibilities” “communicate the roles/responsibilities/scopes of influence” “identification of gaps, needs and roles ”	AT, CZ, LI

Note: for country codes, please check Table 2.5

Previous comments

vandevin (Vincent Van Den Bergen) 11 Jun 2014 12:34:46

with regard to the priority given to water issues in the Deltaprogramme the NL should also figure in the lines on: awareness raising, providing knowledge, capacity building, involvement early, transparancy of the process, continuity of the process, involving a range of staekholders, definition of roles
- makinkir (Kirsi Mäkinen) 17 Jul 2014 10:23:04
  
  Addressed
  
  with regard to the priority given to water issues in the Deltaprogramme the NL should also figure in the lines on: awareness raising, providing knowledge, capacity building, involvement early, transparancy of the process, continuity of the process, involving a range of staekholders, definition of roles
cegartan (Tanja Cegnar) 26 Jun 2014 12:39:58

I propose to delete SI from the list of countries listed in the table 2.10. Our answers last year referred to the process while the Governmental office for climate Change still existed. It was suppressed a couple of years ago and referring to that process is not relevant any more.
- makinkir (Kirsi Mäkinen) 17 Jul 2014 10:23:18
  
  Addressed
  
  I propose to delete SI from the list of countries listed in the table 2.10. Our answers last year referred to the process while the Governmental office for climate Change still existed. It was suppressed a couple of years ago and referring to that process is not relevant any more.
prutsand (Andrea Prutsch) 03 Jul 2014 13:12:41

For Portugal;

It is not clear for us where this infromation comes from. We consider that all categories are applicable to PT.
- makinkir (Kirsi Mäkinen) 17 Jul 2014 10:23:36
  
  Addressed
  
  For Portugal;
  
  It is not clear for us where this infromation comes from. We consider that all categories are applicable to PT.

prutsand (Andrea Prutsch) 11 Jul 2014 16:02:05

For Slovakia:

Basis for involvement
Providing knowledge	“communication of scientific results”	AT, DE, IT, LI, MT, SK
Two way communication	“good communication”	AT, BE, CZ, DK, RO, SK
Methods of involvement	“system approach”	CZ, DE, FI, SK

makinkir (Kirsi Mäkinen) 17 Jul 2014 10:23:46

Addressed

For Slovakia:

Basis for involvement

Providing knowledge

“communication of scientific results”

AT, DE, IT, LI, MT, SK

Two way communication

“good communication”

AT, BE, CZ, DK, RO, SK

Methods of involvement

“system approach”

CZ, DE, FI, SK

You cannot post comments to this consultation because you are not authenticated. Please log in.