Table 2.9 Examples of success factors and challenges of coordination reported by countries
Issue in coordination | Reported success factors | Reported challenges |
Transparency | Transparent process Open dialogue |
|
Knowledge exchange | Interactive and constructive communication Shared knowledge base with regional and local actors Knowledge exchange with responsible entities Extensive awareness events |
Lack of communication campaigns and education Insufficient information exchange and diffusion of studies Lack of platforms for knowledge exchange |
Coordination of stakeholder involvement | Involvement of all sectors Inclusion of all stakeholders National public consultation |
Limited involvement of relevant stakeholders Large number of stakeholders:
|
Commitment by key actors | Shared objectives among stakeholders Commitment and ownership of all relevant ministries Willingness and awareness among members of the coordination group Active and voluntary involvement of all stakeholders Political commitment |
Different interests and priorities among key stakeholders Long term action hinders prioritisation and makes commitment difficult Stakeholders who fear losing will try to counteract Lack of prioritisation of climate change adaptation at high political level |
(Legal) Framework for action | Legal basis for adaptation planning Legally based framework for action |
Insufficient recognition of sub-national levels in NAS Competition with other legally binding agreements (e.g. Natura 2000, WFD) |
Assignment of responsibilities | Designated body in charge of coordination Clearly assigned responsibilities for each priority sector and coordinating body Political mandate for coordination process |
Lack of a responsible body with convening powers Scattered responsibilities and resources |
You cannot post comments to this consultation because you are not authenticated. Please log in.