Post a comment on the text below

Table 2.9 Examples of success factors and challenges of coordination reported by countries

Issue in coordination Reported success factors Reported challenges
Transparency Transparent process

Open dialogue
 
Knowledge exchange Interactive and constructive communication

Shared knowledge base with regional and local actors

Knowledge exchange with responsible entities

Extensive awareness events
Lack of communication campaigns and education

Insufficient information exchange and diffusion of studies

Lack of platforms for knowledge exchange
Coordination of stakeholder involvement Involvement of all sectors

Inclusion of all stakeholders

National public consultation
Limited involvement of relevant stakeholders

Large number of stakeholders:
  • requires time
  • creates a coordination burden
  • makes effective involvement difficult
Commitment by key actors Shared objectives among stakeholders

Commitment and ownership of all relevant ministries

Willingness and awareness among members of the coordination group

Active and voluntary involvement of all stakeholders

Political commitment
Different interests and priorities among key stakeholders

Long term action hinders prioritisation and makes commitment difficult

Stakeholders who fear losing will try to counteract

Lack of prioritisation of climate change adaptation at high political level
(Legal) Framework for action Legal basis for adaptation planning

Legally based framework for action
Insufficient recognition of sub-national levels in NAS

Competition with other legally binding agreements (e.g. Natura 2000, WFD)
Assignment of responsibilities Designated body in charge of coordination

Clearly assigned responsibilities for each priority sector and coordinating body

Political mandate for coordination process
Lack of a responsible body with convening powers

Scattered responsibilities and resources

 

You cannot post comments to this consultation because you are not authenticated. Please log in.